What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

in structures, such as:

Slash your stress by 65% — and in just 8 minutes — with this dreamy fix to ‘calm your brain,’ neurologist says - New York Post

a b i 1 x []

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

What kind of pleasure do gay men get from being bottom? The idea is very appealing to me but in practice it's quite painful.

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

+ for

Experts say THIS diet can significantly reduce blood pressure, even in people with diabetes - Times of India

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

A misplaced MRI found a tumor on her spine. Doctors removed it through her eye in a first-of-its-kind surgery. - CBS News

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.